Difference Systematic and Traditional Narrative Literature Review

Question: Discuss about the Difference And Comparison Between Systematic Literature Review And Traditional Narrative Literature Review. Answer: Introduction The given literature review is based on analysis of five journal articles which has been provided in MyLo. . These papers demonstrate the difference and comparison between systematic literature review and traditional narrative literature review. All the given papers have been analyzed according to the given strengths and weaknesses. Comparison of themes of the articles The first paper Journal of Criminal Justice education provided in the MyLO is enabling reader to effectively write literature review that is regarded as the critical tool for professional careers and academics. Focus of literature review is to study the research questions and it should start from reading the topics in wider concept and then down to analyzing the specific issue. Literature knowledge enables the researcher to enhance the conceptual sensitivity, provide the source for making comparisons, stimulating questions during the analysis and it helps in modeling ways for making claims concerning the possible significance of work (Wong et al. 2013). The theme of third paper is writing up phase of literature review and discussing about review characteristics that confirms the authors authenticity as trustworthy scholar. Important component of research and their essential background is discussed in the paper. Literature review purpose and its outset needs to be identified by users. Literature review needs be contextualize relating to other studies that helps in offering new insight. Paper also identifies the issues faced by researcher while conducting literature review and this involves demonstrating the profound gasp of all the aspects that needs to be investigated. The nature of study is dependent upon the degree to which theoretical knowledge is developed. Literature review can be reviewed with the help of tools such as analyzing, locating and critiquing studies. For viewer intending to contrast studies contrast and compare studies, it is require to conduct critical assessment. On the contrary, the second paper about being systematic in information systems. For conducting literature review in information system, there are several approaches and guidelines. Systematic literature review is the theme of paper along with its procedures and origin. With respect to information system discipline, there has been a notable increase in reference to systematic literature review. The adoption of systematic approach is based on scientific principles that helps in elimination of bias judgment and need for transparency. Literature review in field of information systems are gaining experience arising from the superiority of systematic literature review. This helps in assessing the state of knowledge in a problem domain and weakness identification for carrying further research. Scientific evidence is considered worthy of inclusion and these results in making some other interesting evidence irreverent. On the other side, the article presented in the fourth paper provided in MyLo is about step-to-step guidance and approach that needs to be followed while conducting literature review. Undertaking literature review by nurses is considered difficult, as the composite range of skills are demanded for acquiring such skills required by conducting literature review. This would help researcher in facilitating the process of literature review by presentation of critical elements. This particular paper focuses on process of research by demonstrating the narrative and traditional review. Reviewing of the previous work or literature helps reviewer in summarizing and synthesizing particular area of subject by congregation volume of literature work. The theme of paper is to highlight the significance of new are of research and demonstrate the comprehensive knowledge and significance of new area of research. Literature review is undertaken by research due to several reasons attributable to non-res earch. A detailed discussion of systematic review has been demonstrated in the article discussed and the precise criteria of literature is also provided. Literature review on particular topic is critically evaluated by considering the results of number of studies. Furthermore, the article provide detailed explanation of Meta synthesis and meta-analysis. Met analysis is considered as the statistical techniques and meta synthesis is a technique that is non-statistical (Wong G et al. 2013). The last paper provided is about writing narrative styles relating to literature review. Article provided discusses about usefulness of reviews in conducting clinical research while practice guidelines studies and designing studies. Article demonstrates two standard types of review that involves non-systematic and systematic review. Medical writers are assigned with the task of review writing. Theme of article discussed is recommendation the best way for preparing narrative review in clinical research area. Comparison is made by listing down the differences between the two type of writing in relation to their application areas, writing and objectives. Objectivity of the papers The themes identified in first paper are why discussing and writing up literature review is an essential part of research. Writer needs to educate himself about the topic and establishing the prior knowledge about research topic helps in making as strong as possible. A comprehensive view of the chosen topic is involved in the literature review. Sub themes of literature review focus on various aspects that takes into consideration individual concepts. Writer is also required to take into consideration quantitative and qualitative studies and there exists differences between writing literature review for both types of studies. The construction of literature review depend upon whether the research question is qualitative or qualitative. There are limitations in every types of research. All the above themes needs to be drawn by researcher that helps in strengthening the arguments made by reader in the study. Writing process has natural progression and it is required by writer to fill the relevant gaps after writing has started. The major themes when writing literature review is the identification of the research question related to topics and deciding upon whether to perform qualitative or quantitative studies (Aveyard2014). The sub themes of the paper is to find the source for writing literature review that serves as the building block as it helps in the construction of entire structure. Themes can be further developed reading and finding the source of sub topics that will be included in the literature review. Another sub theme is to support the sub findings of many topics from as many source as possible. Citation is the sub theme of literature review that is required to be double-checked for that they are cited in the original document correctly. Methodology is another focus point of carrying out research and writer develops a new way of framing methodology if there is exists weakness in prior methodology. Evaluation techniques for writing literature review is placing the topics in a logical order so that reader is able to understand the idea and enabling them to make a coherent argument throughout the work (Booth et al. 2014). Completion of literature review should have an appropriate ending and writi ng the same in appropriate way assist professional and academics in enhancing their learning process. Subthemes of the paper is some of the assumptions that has been made in database researches. One of the key process for producing literature review is database searches. In order to avoid inclusion of irrelevant literature, it is essential for research conducting research work in information system to identify the efficient database searches. The distinguishing quality of conducting literature review in information system as per the systematic review guideline is replicability and objectivity. Review outcome concerning these two factors is not guaranteed by systematic literature review. Subjective judgment forms the basis of systematic literature review that cannot be replicable. Systematic literature review concerning information system has various reports with replicability and inter rater reliability. This is attributable to the fact that there is no well-established terminology and phenomena are described in different ways and paraphrased. A good coverage of relevant publications is provided by relevant publications with the help of underlying assumptions (Murphy 2013). Sub theme of the paper is that high quality in literature review can be guaranteed by ensuring replicability, scientific objectivity and review process control claimed by systematic review. Furthermore, the adoption of systematic approach is limited and conditions are disregarded resulting from their uncritical adoption. However, it is questioned that whether the systematic literature review provides the researcher with superiors approach for literature review. The study undertaken by researcher will be able to complete by integrating the reviewed material into something meaningful that helps in depicting the conceptual relevance and logical connectedness to the study. Another step while reviewing literature is reviewing the literature review while maintaining internal consistency. It has been demonstrated in this particular paper that there is requirement of dominating the authority of literature review because it should be known by reader that literature argument should be supported by reviewer command. Article discusses about that there are three attributes of scholarship in literature review and there are two levels of work for writers at literature review. This is in the aspect of researcher and the study itself that is carried out. It is essential for writer to carefully consider the purpose of literature review and one of the source of satisfying strategy is the reports and organization of articles. Moreover, on part of reviewer, it is not essential only to prepare the report; there are some other tasks that is required to be done. This involves verification and explication. The most common reason for carrying out literature review is demonstrated in the paper for developing an argument in the report and enhancing it. In all the phases of research, there is need to have comprehensive literature. Credibility of work of researcher is taken into consideration by considering all the relevant aspects. Development of an argument while reviewing the literature review enables the researcher. Some of the sub themes presented in the article is about the selection of research topic, process or step involved in carrying out literature review, synthesizing and analyzing the literature. Furthermore, writing and structuring of the review after the appraisal of research is completely done by reviewer. Findings of literature review should be demonstrated in such a way that the knowledge developed is presented in consistent and clear way. Article gives in depth analysis and discussion of systematic literature review along with the narrative review by demonstrating their advantages and disadvantages. Review needs to be framed in the process of literature review. Article involves the feature of methodology of systematic review in line with searching for narrative review. Another essential part of literature review is the inclusion of methodologies critical review. Article depicts that while carrying out the process of literature review, it is required to address some of the contradictions and inconsistencies while performing the literature review. It is essential for the review or the researcher writing the literature review that writing is a skill that needs to be learned and knowledge of nursing are enhanced by involving them in reviewing the literature along with systematic reviewing. This is so because the evidence based practice will help them in enhancing the care for patients. Sub themes involves on the preparation of literature review is the literature search that is not considered mandatory for narrative research, search terms, selection criteria, critical assessment, text crafting. The evaluation technique of the themes discussed in the article is depicted by way of critically assessing and reviewing different issues related to analysis, accuracy methods and coherence. Evaluation of the study presented in the article can be done by looking at the points such as result interpretation, quality of obtained results, limitations, key results, conclusion impact on field and testing the initial results by using suitability of methods (Booth et al. 2016). There can be the certainty of inconsistencies in the study that needs to be highlighted by making the best contributions. However , if there is any missing evidence in the article, review or reader needs to have the integration of new articles. Conclusion It can be said that for the medical literature synthesis, the cornerstone is considered as the narrative review. Article depicts that quality of narrative review can be improved and enhanced by establishment of relevance criteria for selection, emphasizing the well-defined issues. Inadequate reporting influences the translation, interpretation and public research application and considering this, it is considered crucial to have methodological approach to narrative review. References: Aveyard, H., 2014.Doing a literature review in health and social care: A practical guide. McGraw-Hill Education (UK). Booth, A., Sutton, A. and Papaioannou, D., 2016.Systematic approaches to a successful literature review. Sage. Liumbruno GM, Velati C, Pasqualetti P, Franchini M.,2013How to write a scientific manuscript for publication.Blood Trans;11:217226. Murphy CM. ,2012Writing an effective review article. JMed Toxicol;8:8990. Wong G, Greenhalgh T, Westhorp G, Buckingham J,Pawson R., 2013 RAMESES publication standard: realisticsyntheses. BMC Med;11:21.